Op welke bronnen zijn de tools gebaseerd?

Interviewtool leraren

  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P .C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009a). How do teachers learn in the workplace? An examination of teacher learning activities. European Journal of Teacher Education. 32, 209-225
  • Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009b). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Éducation, 15, 89-100
  • Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2013). Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT. Computers & Education, 68, 380-387.

Zelfregulatietool

  • Vandevelde, S., Keer, H. van, Rosseel, Y. (2013). Measuring the complexity of upper primary school children’s selfregulated learning: A multi-component approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 407-425. Instrument: CP-SRLI.

Motivatietool

  • Sol, Y.B. & Stokking, K.M. (2008). Het handelen van docenten in scholen met een vernieuwend onderwijsconcept. Ontwikkeling, gebruik en opbrengsten van een instrument (Kortlopend onderwijsonderzoek. Vormgeving en leerprocessen, 71). Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
  • Guay, F., Vallarand, R.J. & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24 (3), 175-213.
  • Standage, M., Treasure, D. C., Duda, J. L. and Prusak, K. A., 2003. Validity, reliability, and invariance of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) across diverse physical activity contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25 (1), pp. 19-43.
  • Sol, Y.B. & Stokking, K.M. (2009). Mondelinge feedback bij zelfstandig werken. Interactie tussen docenten en leerlingen in het VO. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.

Observatietool

  • ICALT observatie instrument
  • Van de Grift, W., Helms-Lorenz, M. & Maulana, R. (2014). Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement . Studies in Educational Evaluation , 43, 150-159. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.09.003
  • Kim Stroet (2014). Studying motivation in classrooms. Effects of teaching practices on early adolescents’ motivation (proefschrift). Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  • Tomlinson, Brimijoin & Narvaez (2008). The Differentiated School: Making Revolutionary Changes in Teaching and Learning: Differentiated Instruction.

Autonomietool

  • Weijers, D., Van der Veen, I., Hornstra, L. & Peetsma, T. (2017) Motivating primary school students with different background characteristics: A teacher training in autonomy-support and structure.
  • Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1988). Teacher as social context: A measure of student perceptions of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support (Tech. rep. no. 102). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
    De autonomietool is een aangepaste ‘Teacher as Social Context Questionnaire student-report’.

Inzettool

  • Weijers, D., Van der Veen, I., Hornstra, L. & Peetsma, T. (2017) Motivating primary school students with different background characteristics: A teacher training in autonomy-support and structure.
  • Guay, F., Vallarand, R.J. & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion 24 (3), 175-213.
  • Roede E. (1989). Explaining student investment, an investigation of high school students’ retrospective causal accounts of their investment in school. Academic dissertation. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.

Zelfvertrouwentool

  • Duijnhouwer, H. (2010) Feedback effects onstudents’ writing motivation, process and performance. Utrecht university

Deel dit bericht

Blijf op de hoogte

Meld je aan voor de Voortgezet Leren nieuwsbrief en ontvang het laatste nieuws en praktijkvoorbeelden
Meld je aan voor de nieuwsbrief